Sean Combs' Sentencing Set for October After Conviction on Prostitution Charges

Sean 'Diddy' Combs to Be Sentenced in October Following Mixed Verdict in Federal Trial
NEW YORK – A federal judge has scheduled an October 3 sentencing date for music and business mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs, who was convicted last week on two federal charges of transporting individuals for prostitution. The decision comes after a jury acquitted him of more severe allegations, including sex trafficking conspiracy and racketeering.
U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian endorsed the sentencing date in a letter filed in Manhattan federal court on Tuesday, setting the stage for the next chapter in a high-stakes case that has captivated the public and shaken the entertainment industry. Combs faces a statutory maximum of 10 years in prison for each count, though his final sentence will be determined by Judge Subramanian based on federal guidelines and case specifics.
The verdict, delivered last week by a federal jury after days of deliberation, presented a complex outcome. While prosecutors secured a conviction, the acquittal on the racketeering and sex trafficking conspiracy charges represented a significant victory for Combs’ defense team. These more serious charges could have resulted in a decades-long prison sentence.
The Verdict and Its Implications
The jury found Combs guilty of two counts under the Mann Act, a federal law that prohibits transporting individuals across state lines for the purpose of prostitution or other illegal sexual activity. The prosecution argued that Combs used his wealth and influence to facilitate a network that exploited women for commercial sex.
Throughout the trial, federal prosecutors presented testimony from several women who alleged that Combs and his associates orchestrated their travel for sexual encounters. The government’s case was built on financial records, travel logs, and witness accounts aiming to prove a pattern of illegal activity.
However, the jury did not find sufficient evidence to convict Combs on the sweeping charge of leading a criminal enterprise engaged in sex trafficking, as defined by the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The acquittal on this count spared Combs the most severe potential penalties associated with the trial.
Reactions from Both Sides
In a statement following the verdict, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York said, "Today's conviction ensures that Sean Combs is held accountable for the criminal conduct he was found to have committed. We thank the brave individuals who came forward and the jury for their service." The prosecution has not yet commented on the sentencing date.
Combs’ lead attorney, Aaron Dyer, reiterated his client's innocence on the more serious charges and indicated plans to appeal the convictions. "While we are disappointed with the two convictions, we are relieved that the jury acquitted Mr. Combs on the most serious and unfounded charges of racketeering and sex trafficking," Dyer said last week. "This was a gross overreach by the government, and we will continue to fight to clear his name."
Broader Context and What Lies Ahead
The federal trial stemmed from a sprawling investigation that culminated in highly publicized raids on Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami in March. The case is one of several legal battles the founder of Bad Boy Records is facing.
He remains a defendant in multiple civil lawsuits filed by individuals, including his former partner, the singer Casandra "Cassie" Ventura, who accuse him of sexual assault and other abuses. Ventura's lawsuit, filed last year, was settled quickly but appeared to catalyze further scrutiny from federal investigators.
The October sentencing will be a pivotal moment, determining the immediate consequences for the 54-year-old entrepreneur. Legal experts suggest that while the acquittals will weigh heavily in his favor, the convictions are felonies that carry the potential for significant prison time. Judge Subramanian will consider the evidence presented at trial, pre-sentencing reports, and arguments from both the prosecution and defense before making his final determination.