Legal Challenge Questions Validity of Alina Habba's Appointment as Top NJ Prosecutor

NEWARK, NJ – The legal authority of Alina Habba, the U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey and a prominent legal ally of former President Donald Trump, is facing a significant challenge in federal court. A new motion filed this week seeks to dismiss a criminal indictment by arguing that Habba’s appointment is illegitimate, a move that could have far-reaching implications for federal prosecutions across the state.
The nine-page filing, submitted on Monday by defense attorney Marc D. Mirigliano, contends that his client is "facing an imminent criminal trial proceeding under questionable legal authority." The motion asks a federal judge to either throw out the charges or disqualify Habba and her office from the case, asserting that her appointment by a panel of judges violates federal law.
This legal challenge brings a simmering controversy over Habba's ascension to the forefront, creating uncertainty for one of the nation's busiest and most powerful U.S. Attorney's offices.
The Heart of the Dispute: An Unconventional Appointment
The central issue is the process by which Habba assumed office. Typically, U.S. Attorneys are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. However, when the previous U.S. Attorney, Philip R. Sellinger, resigned, Habba was appointed to the position by a majority vote of the active district court judges in New Jersey.
Mirigliano’s filing, first reported by Politico, argues that this judicial appointment sidesteps the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA). The FVRA is the primary statute governing how temporary appointments are made to senior federal positions that require Senate confirmation. The motion posits that the law providing for judicial appointment of an interim U.S. Attorney was effectively superseded by the FVRA, rendering Habba's position legally untenable.
If this argument prevails, it could call into question the legitimacy of any indictments, plea agreements, and other official actions taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office since Habba took charge. Legal experts suggest that such a ruling could open the door to a flood of similar challenges from other defendants in New Jersey.
A High-Profile Prosecutor Under Scrutiny
Alina Habba is a nationally recognized figure, known for her vigorous defense of Donald Trump in numerous civil and criminal matters prior to her appointment. Her selection as New Jersey's top federal prosecutor was viewed by many as a highly political move, given her close ties to the former president. The current legal challenge moves the focus from the political realm to the foundational legality of her authority to prosecute federal crimes.
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey has not yet filed a formal response to the motion. The government will be expected to defend the legality of the judicial appointment process, likely arguing that it is a long-standing practice permitted under a separate federal statute that was not invalidated by the FVRA.
The case now rests with the presiding judge, who must decide whether the challenge has merit. Regardless of the initial ruling, the decision is likely to be appealed, setting the stage for a prolonged legal battle that could ultimately be decided by a higher court.
For now, the filing casts a shadow of legal uncertainty over federal law enforcement in New Jersey. The outcome will not only determine the fate of the defendant in this specific case but could also establish a critical precedent for the appointment of federal prosecutors nationwide. ## IMAGE GENERATION PROMPTS
{
"image1": "Photojournalistic composite image. On the left, a professional portrait of U.S. Attorney Alina Habba. On the right, the exterior of the Martin Luther King Jr. Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Newark. A transparent image of a judge's gavel is overlaid in the center. Sober, serious tone, news magazine style.",
"image2": "Wide shot of the Martin Luther King Jr. Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Newark, New Jersey. The photograph is taken on a slightly overcast day, with even, natural lighting. A few pedestrians are visible on the sidewalk to provide scale. The shot should be clean, architecturally focused, and convey a sense of institutional gravity. Captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, f/8.",
"image3": "Medium shot of Alina Habba speaking seriously at a press conference podium. She is wearing a dark professional suit. The background is a blurred wall with a Department of Justice seal and the tips of microphones visible. The lighting is from the front and slightly to the side, typical of a media event. The image should look authentic and unposed, captured with a 70-200mm telephoto lens, f/2.8."
}