WASHINGTON D.C. — Former U.S. Vice-President Kamala Harris has unleashed a potent critique of her former boss, Joe Biden, asserting that his decision to seek a second term was an act of "recklessness." The revelation comes from an excerpt of her eagerly anticipated memoir, "107 Days," first reported by the BBC, and is set to send shockwaves through the Democratic Party and U.S. political landscape.

Published on September 10, 2025, the excerpt details Harris's perspective on the critical period leading up to Biden's re-election announcement. She contends it was "reckless" for the then-President to make such a consequential decision unilaterally, without broader consultation or a more robust assessment of the political climate and his own position. This marks Harris's sharpest public criticism of Biden to date, moving beyond subtle disagreements to a direct questioning of his judgment on a pivotal matter.

The Memoir: "107 Days" and Its Context

Harris's memoir, titled "107 Days," is expected to provide an intimate look into her time in the Vice-Presidency, particularly focusing on the final period of the administration. While specific details beyond the "recklessness" quote remain under wraps until the book's full release, the title itself suggests a focus on a pivotal period, possibly the critical final months or the lead-up to the 2024 election cycle.

The decision for a sitting president to seek re-election is typically a monumental one, involving extensive internal discussions, polling data, and strategic planning. Harris's characterization suggests a breakdown in this process, implying a lack of transparency or collaboration at the highest echelons of power.

Political analysts are already dissecting the implications of Harris's words. "This is more than just a tell-all; it's a strategic positioning," noted Dr. Evelyn Reed, a political science professor at Georgetown University. "For a former Vice-President to use such a strong term like 'recklessness' about a sitting president's core decision implies a significant, perhaps irreparable, rift. It also sets the stage for Harris's own future political ambitions, clearly distancing herself from perceived missteps of the past administration."

Why This Matters: Political Fallout and Future Aspirations

The timing of this excerpt's release, nearly a year after the 2024 presidential election, is crucial. With the next election cycle already beginning to form in the public consciousness, Harris's commentary could significantly influence the narrative surrounding the Democratic Party's recent history and its future leadership.

This criticism could be interpreted in several ways:

• A historical re-evaluation: It offers an insider's account that challenges the official narrative of a unified front within the Biden administration.
• Harris's political future: By highlighting what she perceives as a critical error, Harris may be attempting to carve out a distinct identity and platform, positioning herself as a leader with a different approach to governance and decision-making. This could be particularly relevant for any potential future presidential bids of her own.
• Impact on Biden's legacy: While Biden is no longer in office, such critiques from a former insider can shape public perception of his presidency, potentially influencing how future historians and voters view his tenure and choices.

Sources close to the former Biden administration have yet to issue a formal response to Harris's specific claim. However, it is anticipated that any comments will likely emphasize the complexities of presidential decision-making and the pressures inherent in the office.

Broader Implications for Democratic Unity

The memoir's revelations could also reignite conversations about the internal dynamics of the Democratic Party and the challenges of succession. Historically, public disagreements between former presidential and vice-presidential partners are rare, especially those employing such stark language.

"This isn't just a personal opinion; it reflects a potentially deeper ideological or strategic disagreement that was simmering beneath the surface," commented a veteran Democratic strategist, who requested anonymity due to ongoing party affiliations. "It forces the party to confront questions about how decisions are made at the top and the extent of internal dissent."

As "107 Days" approaches its full release, the political world will be watching closely for further insights and the potential ramifications of Harris's candid account. The excerpt has already ensured the memoir will be a must-read, not just for political enthusiasts, but for anyone keen to understand the intricate power plays and personal convictions shaping American leadership.